World Journal of Nephrology and Urology, ISSN 1927-1239 print, 1927-1247 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Nephrol Urol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://wjnu.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 3, July 2026, pages 71-81


Association Between Bladder Volume Changes and Organ-at-Risk Dose Constraints in a Moderate Hypofractionation for Prostate Cancer

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. CBCT: cone beam computed tomography; CT: computed tomography; DVH: dose–volume histogram.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Correlation between bladder volume (mL) and bladder dose (dose–volume constraints) in the 70 Gy/28 fractions radiotherapy protocol. LOWESS: locally weighted regression plots.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Correlation between bladder volume (mL) and rectal dose (dose–volume constraints) in the 70 Gy/28 fractions radiotherapy protocol. LOWESS: locally weighted regression plots.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Correlation between bladder volume (mL) and bladder dose (dose–volume constraints) in the 60 Gy/20 fractions radiotherapy protocol. BC: bladder constraint; LOWESS: locally weighted regression plots.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Correlation between bladder volume (mL) and rectal dose (dose–volume constraints) in the 60 Gy/20 fractions radiotherapy protocol. LOWESS: locally weighted regression plots; RC: rectal constraint.
Figure 5.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Patient Characteristic
 
Patient characteristic, n (%)70 Gy/28 Fr (n = 11)60 Gy/20 Fr (n = 4)
Fr: fraction; Gy: gray; NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; SD: standard deviation.
Age (year), mean (± SD)73 (5.0)69 (6.3)
NCCN risk group
  Low-risk1 (9.1)1 (25.0)
  Favorable intermediate-risk02 (50.0)
  Unfavorable intermediate-risk3 (27.3)0
  High-risk7 (63.6)1 (25.0)
Clinical stage
  T12 (63.6)0
  T26 (54.6)3 (75.0)
  T32 (18.2)1 (25.0)
  T41 (9.1)0
Bladder filling time (min), mean (± SD)52 (12.3)47.5 (8.6)

 

↓  Table 2. Bladder Volume Thresholds (95th and 100th Percentiles) and Adjusted Dose Constraint Correlations by Radiotherapy Protocol and Organ at Risk
 
P95 BV (mL)P100 BV (mL)Adjusted BV vs. dose constraint correlation
RD per 100 mL BV (95% CI)SEP value
Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel mixed-effects regression, adjusting for age, prostate cancer recurrence risk (unfavorable/high), and bladder filling session number. a–eThe reported bladder volume values correspond to the following percentiles: a95.9th percentile; b96.2th percentile; c97.6th percentile; d96.4th percentile; e99th percentile. P95 BV and P100 BV: Bladder volumes at which 95% and 100% of radiotherapy sessions, respectively, did not exceed the dose constraint (i.e., no overdose observed). NA: No session exceeded the dose threshold for the specified constraint. BV: bladder volume; CI: confidence interval; Fr: fraction; Gy: gray; RD: risk difference; SE: standard error.
70 Gy/28 Fr dose constraint
  Bladder constraints (%)
    V79 < 15%NA
    V74 < 25%NA
    V69 < 35%173.9238.2–6.4 (–7.3, –5.6)0.45< 0.001
    V64 < 50%85.2238.2–7.8 (–8.7, –6.8)0.49< 0.001
  Rectum constraints (%)
    V74 < 15%NA
    V69 < 25%< 43.4a243.9–1.0 (–2.0, –0.1)0.470.029
    V64 < 35%< 43.4b323.3–1.4 (–2.6, –0.3)0.590.017
    V50 < 50%288.4537.5–2.2 (–3.7, –0.8)0.740.003
60 Gy/20 Fr dose constraint
  Bladder constraints (%)
    V60 < 5%223364.2–3.1 (–4.3, –1.9)0.61< 0.001
    V48.6 < 25%166.6243.9–5.6 (–7.1, –4.1)0.78< 0.001
    V40.8 < 50%< 81.1c125–7.8 (–9.6, –6.0)0.90< 0.001
  Rectum constraints (%)
    V60 < 3%293.9362.4–0.1 (–0.9, 0.7)0.400.755
    V57 < 15%< 112.7d265.3–0.4 (–1.7, 0.8)0.640.519
    V52.8 < 30%< 112.7d282.6–0.9 (–2.7, 0.9)0.910.351
    V48.6 < 50%< 228.9e265.3–0.8 (–3.0, 1.4)0.110.463
    V40.8 < 60%223282.7–1.0 (–3.5, 1.5)0.130.424

 

↓  Table 3. Association Between Patient and Treatment Factors and the Risk of Weighted Overdose Counts, Analyzed Using Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression
 
VariablesBladder constraintRectal constraint
IRR (95% CI)SEP valueIRR (95% CI)SEP value
60 Gy/20 Fr: One of the two radiation therapy protocols used in the study; the other was 70 Gy/28 Fr. Recurrence risk: High-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BV: bladder volume; Fr: fraction; Gy: gray; IRR: incidence rate ratio; SE: standard error.
Age1.08 (0.96, 1.21)0.060.2170.99 (0.90, 1.08)0.050.760
Effect of sessions1.00 (0.98, 1.01)0.010.7051.02 (0.99, 1.04)0.010.148
BV per 100 mL0.37 (0.17, 0.79)0.140.0110.80 (0.50, 1.25)0.180.321
Recurrence risk2.41 (1.12, 5.16)0.940.0241.48 (0.88, 2.48)0.390.141
Filling time1.05 (0.97, 1.14)0.040.2101.02 (0.97, 1.08)0.030.387
60 Gy/20 Fr15.4 (2.93, 81.02)13.040.0014.71 (1.45, 15.35)2.830.010